All projects are different, which means that each of them needs a different type of schedule. It should be in line with the goals and tokenomics of the project. Here are the main types of such schedules:
Linear Vesting
In this case, assets are unlocked evenly over a certain period. This type of vesting is great for projects that need a constant increase in supply. Also, it does not have such a strong impact on the market at the time of unlocking. On the other hand, it is not the best option for incentivizing holdings to meet project objectives.
Westing and Cliffing
When this strategy is chosen, project assets are locked up until a certain date, after which they are partially or fully released. It is suitable for those projects that want to prevent asset shedding in the early stages, but can cause market volatility and change the fear and greed index.
Phased
This combination of linear and cliff vesting involves unlocking a portion of assets after a cliff period and gradually releasing the balance. It is best suited for balancing immediate rewards with long-term liabilities.
Benchmark-based
This type allows assets to be unlocked as certain targets are achieved. It suits projects that want to link token allocations to progress and encourage investors to focus on results. The disadvantage of this strategy is the uncertainty surrounding the unlocking date.
Hybrid
This type combines linear, cliff and incremental. It is usually suitable for those projects that want to reward both time investments and certain results. On the other hand, organizing and implementing such a strategy can be quite complex.
Partial unlocking
This type involves unlocking one part of the assets as soon as they are allocated and gradually releasing the other part. It is suitable for projects that want to obtain some liquidity in advance. This type does not jeopardize the stability of the market, but may cause token sales.
Some projects prefer to combine the best qualities of all types of vesting and create their own variant of the strategy.